Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Felix Corwin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Corwin analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Felix Corwin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Corwin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 48.63% of points on their second serve, while Corwin has won 45.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 51.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Corwin has won 51.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.61% and 37.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 53.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Corwin has saved 58.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 61.7% of matches played (W/L 58/ 36), with Corwin winning 62.9% (W/L 39/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Corwin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 137/ 94).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 45/ 20), where as Corwin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66% of matches (W/L 33/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times and Corwin being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Corwin winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Corwin was at the M25 The Hague, 05-07-2023, First, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Corwin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Corwin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Corwin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.38 while Corwin has played against players with an average rank of 124.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Corwin has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 43.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Corwin has converted 41.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
431
Rank
428
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
679
Rank
478
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
57% (224-172)
Career Total W/L
59% (219-150)
55% (22-18)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Felix Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (43/56) | 62% (45/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 64% (29/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (6/13) | 25% (7/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (37/73) | 36% (20/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Felix Corwin
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Felix Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (22/18) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (52/42) | 49% (30/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (462/427) | 51% (297/290) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 133 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 159 | 106 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:20 | 2:7:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.22 | 134.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1679/2810) | 57% (1066/1886) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1145/1679) | 69% (737/1066) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (550/1131) | 46% (374/820) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (139/321) | 41% (91/221) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1186/2853) | 43% (835/1962) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (9/11) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (13/7) | 54% (7/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (22/40) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 78% (7/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 33% (12/4) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
George Goldhoff
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Felix Corwin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Felix Corwin
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
87)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Felix Corwin
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Samuel Nicholson
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Felix Corwin
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
45%
(
25 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Denisov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Corwin Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nijboer are available here and Corwin photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
